PP: Why are you running for this seat?
Penner:
Well, I’ve been in public service for a long time. I’ve been a township
official. I’ve done charity work, including as head of the Defiance
Area Foundation. I’ve been involved in politics along the line. I was
chairman of the party at one time in Defiance County.
It’s about
opportunity, and when Craig [Riedel] gave up the seat to run for
Congress, it gave us an opening. I felt the time was right. I feel I’ve
got something to contribute. I’m at a stage in my life where it would be
interesting to go down to Columbus, do my thing and serve the people of
the district. I think I share the values of our district very well, and
I think I can go down and do a good job.
PP: How do you think your time as a township trustee and township fiscal officer has prepared you for the job?
Penner:
You learn to listen to your constituents. You learn how to weigh
things, because oftentimes someone will come to you with an issue, and
it’s really interesting. It makes a lot of sense, but then you have to
dig deeper. It’s just really what benefits the district. Does this
benefit all of our constituents or just a few? You learn to put in
enough thought and research into the issue, and ask is this really good
for the whole community or just select areas.
PP:
Are there specific things you would like to accomplish in Columbus?
Have you thought about what you would like to do once you’re in the
position?
Penner: I don’t have anything specific.
I don’t think you can go in thinking “I’m going to make this law.” I
don’t think you can go down there with narrow of a focus. You know, when
I see elections, local, regional, if I see someone with a very specific
agenda, typically, they don’t make a great legislator or councilman or
whatever, because they focus on that one thing and miss the bigger
picture. So, I don’t have a specific item.
However, I do feel like
I can go down and help facilitate consensus building. And my background
such that I plan to focus on economic issues. I have said economic
issues has a really broad meaning. Education is now an economic issue.
We need to get proper workforce training. Housing is an economic issue
because we have to have places for our employees to live if we’re going
to expand economically, so those are just two examples within broad
economic areas.
I think that’s where my expertise is. I think I
have skills in consensus building. My business background, both legal
and accounting, as well as my public service have been all about
consensus building, negotiating, and getting something accomplished, as
opposed to just focusing in on my way or the highway.
I’m not that
ind of person. I mean I have strong beliefs, but I want to go down,
help consensus build, and get the right legislation passed for our
district.
PP: Our landscape has shifted over the
past twenty years. Some of it relates to agriculture as well, because of
where the wind farms are, and now solar farms are going in. How do you
strike a balance between the rights of a landowner to enter into an
agreement with a solar company and their property rights with the
broader rights of people in the community? Senate Bill 52 has already
past, and it’s given local agencies a voice in these projects. But it’s
one of the defining issues of our time, where one person’s rights end
and another begins.
Penner: Right, and you know
I’m all for property rights because I’m a property owner. And so, I get
that. You use the perfect phrase, is the balance. I’m in a zoned
township, but not all townships are zoned.
There’s the economic
side of the whole thing, and that doesn’t get a lot of attention. It is
primarily looked at from a land use standpoint. And I compare it a bit
to zoning, in part because that’s what a lot of people are a little more
familiar with. If my neighbor wants to build a house, there’s a process
to go through, and yes, you’ve got to get a rezone or you must get some
approval, and that goes through pretty well.
Then I use the
example of my neighbor, but instead of a house, he wants to build a
distribution warehouse. Then, you know, the long-standing process has
given the community some input of does this fit with our community?
Obviously, there’s economic benefit, but there’s also some aesthetic
issues. There are infrastructure issues. You have to consider all of
these items.
Senate Bill 52 makes a good attempt at trying to
strike the balance. Is it perfect? Maybe, maybe not. We don’t really
know yet. But I think we need some method for community input. The old
method was like the Ohio Power Siting Board and Columbus made the
decision, and we were forced to live with it. And I don’t think that’s
how the 82nd District is set up.
I like local input. You start
weighing the economic benefits to local governments and schools versus
the aesthetics or the infrastructure, and you come up with a way to make
it happen.
PP: What are you most proud of from your time as a township trustee?
Penner:
In my township experiences, I think it has been a combination of our
financial stability, and our ability to grow the township, both
financially and from our population base. Our budget has increased, our
tax base has increased, and we’ve worked to help facilitate that.
But
growth comes with a price. You increase your tax base, but you’ve also
got to provide the services. Over my tenure, I think we’ve moved
forward, we’ve grown, and I think we’ve improved the quality of life for
our citizens. I think we’re in a good place.
PP: What is the biggest challenge facing the 82nd District over the next five to ten years?
Penner:
I think the biggest challenge for the 82nd is growth, and by growth, I
mean how do we maintain our quality of life but grow economically to
stay relevant and preserve our way of life? You’ve got to evolve as you
go. When I look back, we’ve done a pretty good job of that. We’re very
self-sufficient up here, we’re proud of that self-sufficiency, and we’re
proud of our conservative values. The biggest challenge is to maintain
that, yet evolve, stay relevant and continue to improve.
PP: Why should someone vote for you? What’s your elevator speech so to speak?
Penner:
First, I think my value system fits with 82nd district. That’s the
threshold argument, that my value system fits. My background is very
diverse. Those two things coupled together, I think I can go to Columbus
and get things done while representing the values of the 82nd. I think I
can go down and an impact and leave the 82nd District better than I
found it, and it’s in great shape. Don’t get me wrong. I think I can
relate to the whole district. I’ve met some great people out there and
I’ve gotten a very good reception. But, you know, that’s the way the
people of the 82nd district are. We’re respectful and have good core
values.